• 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • درباره ما
  • درخواست موردی
  • فهرست استانداردها
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • راهنما
  • Login
  • لیست خرید شما 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
View Item 
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • View Item
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • View Item
  • All Fields
  • Title(or Doc Num)
  • Organization
  • Year
  • Subject
Advanced Search
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Archive

NASA-LLIS-1274

Lessons Learned – Planning and Design of Test Series

Organization:
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Year: 1998

Abstract: Description of Driving Event:
Flight element testing is very necessary but expensive; program schedule pressures typically mandate performing the minimum set of tests possible. The paper/documentation process associated with troubleshooting problems and/or performing detailed investigations of unexpected test results can significantly add to the time required to perform detailed tests on flight hardware/elements.
In this particular event, a minimum amount of pre-planning (i.e. insufficiently defined test requirements) resulted in power quality test implementation at KSC on the ISS Flight Node 1 that required replanning/rescoping the tests "on the fly" at KSC. Compounding the event was unexpected test results from the Russian to American Converter Unit (RACU) that forced the onsite test team along with support personnel from Boeing Canoga Park to perform detailed troubleshooting which further delayed the formal testing progress. Due to the unplanned, excessive time spent on Node 1 Power Quality Testing, valuable schedule reserves for the Flight Node 1 were lost. In addition, the NASA & Boeing Power AIT were forced to fly technical personnel and hardware to and from KSC, JSC and Boeing CP in order to support the Node 1 testing. Further, at risk was the opportunity to obtain all of the necessary data to both verify the Node 1 power system and to validate the electronic models necessary to verify the end to end power system functionality.
URI: http://yse.yabesh.ir/std;jsery=autho146/handle/yse/209942
Subject: Configuration Management
Collections :
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • Download PDF : (16.10Kb)
  • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
  • Statistics

    NASA-LLIS-1274

Show full item record

contributor authorNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
date accessioned2017-09-04T18:27:43Z
date available2017-09-04T18:27:43Z
date copyright04/20/1998
date issued1998
identifier otherIOVEQCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf
identifier urihttp://yse.yabesh.ir/std;jsery=autho146/handle/yse/209942
description abstractDescription of Driving Event:
Flight element testing is very necessary but expensive; program schedule pressures typically mandate performing the minimum set of tests possible. The paper/documentation process associated with troubleshooting problems and/or performing detailed investigations of unexpected test results can significantly add to the time required to perform detailed tests on flight hardware/elements.
In this particular event, a minimum amount of pre-planning (i.e. insufficiently defined test requirements) resulted in power quality test implementation at KSC on the ISS Flight Node 1 that required replanning/rescoping the tests "on the fly" at KSC. Compounding the event was unexpected test results from the Russian to American Converter Unit (RACU) that forced the onsite test team along with support personnel from Boeing Canoga Park to perform detailed troubleshooting which further delayed the formal testing progress. Due to the unplanned, excessive time spent on Node 1 Power Quality Testing, valuable schedule reserves for the Flight Node 1 were lost. In addition, the NASA & Boeing Power AIT were forced to fly technical personnel and hardware to and from KSC, JSC and Boeing CP in order to support the Node 1 testing. Further, at risk was the opportunity to obtain all of the necessary data to both verify the Node 1 power system and to validate the electronic models necessary to verify the end to end power system functionality.
languageEnglish
titleNASA-LLIS-1274num
titleLessons Learned – Planning and Design of Test Seriesen
typestandard
page3
statusActive
treeNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;1998
contenttypefulltext
subject keywordsConfiguration Management
subject keywordsIndependent Verification and Validation
subject keywordsPolicy & Planning
subject keywordsResearch & Development
subject keywordsRisk Management/Assessment
subject keywordsSafety & Mission Assurance
subject keywordsTest & Verification
subject keywordsTest Article
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian
 
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian