درباره ما
ASME MFC-13M
Measurement of Fluid Flow in Closed Conduits: Tracer Methods
Organization:
ASME - ASME International
Year: 2014
Abstract: SCOPE AND FIELD OF APPLICATION
For steady-state flow of fluid in a closed conduit, the only conserved parameter is the mass rate of flow, qm. If the mass density is known, the volume rate of flow, qv, can be deduced.
The accuracy of flow rate measurement with the tracer methods is a function of how well the injected tracer material mixes with the flowing fluid. It is also a function of the accuracy and precision of the sensing devices, and the (tracer methods) techniques used.
The following two tracer methods are used:
(a) The dilution method is based on a constant rate of tracer injection, and the concentration of tracer found in the downstream conduit is a measure of the relative flow rates.
(b) The transit time method determines the flow rate by measuring the time it takes the tracer material to travel between two detector points or between the injection point and a detector point in the conduit.
The advantages and disadvantages of these two methods are reviewed in section 4.
A wide variety of tracer materials may be used — radioactive or nonradioactive, mineral or organic materials, etc. The choice of tracer depends on the purpose of the measurement and environmental concerns (section 5). The uncertainty of the measurements depends completely on the accuracy of the methods used (section 7). Some typical tracer fluids are listed in Nonmandatory Appendix A.
For steady-state flow of fluid in a closed conduit, the only conserved parameter is the mass rate of flow, qm. If the mass density is known, the volume rate of flow, qv, can be deduced.
The accuracy of flow rate measurement with the tracer methods is a function of how well the injected tracer material mixes with the flowing fluid. It is also a function of the accuracy and precision of the sensing devices, and the (tracer methods) techniques used.
The following two tracer methods are used:
(a) The dilution method is based on a constant rate of tracer injection, and the concentration of tracer found in the downstream conduit is a measure of the relative flow rates.
(b) The transit time method determines the flow rate by measuring the time it takes the tracer material to travel between two detector points or between the injection point and a detector point in the conduit.
The advantages and disadvantages of these two methods are reviewed in section 4.
A wide variety of tracer materials may be used — radioactive or nonradioactive, mineral or organic materials, etc. The choice of tracer depends on the purpose of the measurement and environmental concerns (section 5). The uncertainty of the measurements depends completely on the accuracy of the methods used (section 7). Some typical tracer fluids are listed in Nonmandatory Appendix A.
Collections
:
Show full item record
| contributor author | ASME - ASME International | |
| date accessioned | 2017-09-04T18:35:28Z | |
| date available | 2017-09-04T18:35:28Z | |
| date copyright | 2006.01.01 (R 2014) | |
| date issued | 2014 | |
| identifier other | JIWSHFAAAAAAAAAA.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yse.yabesh.ir/std;jsery=autho470393FDFCDCAC4/handle/yse/217508 | |
| description abstract | SCOPE AND FIELD OF APPLICATION For steady-state flow of fluid in a closed conduit, the only conserved parameter is the mass rate of flow, qm. If the mass density is known, the volume rate of flow, qv, can be deduced. The accuracy of flow rate measurement with the tracer methods is a function of how well the injected tracer material mixes with the flowing fluid. It is also a function of the accuracy and precision of the sensing devices, and the (tracer methods) techniques used. The following two tracer methods are used: (a) The dilution method is based on a constant rate of tracer injection, and the concentration of tracer found in the downstream conduit is a measure of the relative flow rates. (b) The transit time method determines the flow rate by measuring the time it takes the tracer material to travel between two detector points or between the injection point and a detector point in the conduit. The advantages and disadvantages of these two methods are reviewed in section 4. A wide variety of tracer materials may be used — radioactive or nonradioactive, mineral or organic materials, etc. The choice of tracer depends on the purpose of the measurement and environmental concerns (section 5). The uncertainty of the measurements depends completely on the accuracy of the methods used (section 7). Some typical tracer fluids are listed in Nonmandatory Appendix A. | |
| language | English | |
| title | ASME MFC-13M | num |
| title | Measurement of Fluid Flow in Closed Conduits: Tracer Methods | en |
| type | standard | |
| page | 24 | |
| status | Active | |
| tree | ASME - ASME International:;2014 | |
| contenttype | fulltext |