ASME STP-PT-022
COMPARISON AND VALIDATION OF CREEP-BUCKLING ANALYSIS METHODS
| contributor author | ASME - ASME International | |
| date accessioned | 2017-09-04T15:09:25Z | |
| date available | 2017-09-04T15:09:25Z | |
| date copyright | 2008.09.03 | |
| date issued | 2008 | |
| identifier other | LNYXHFAAAAAAAAAA.pdf | |
| identifier uri | https://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/7467 | |
| description abstract | This report provides comparisons of creep-buckling calculations and provides guidance on approximate methods which are feasible for design. This report includes a discussion of the various creep models, presents creep buckling analysis techniques, and provides several comparative example calculations. The techniques discussed in this report include: 1. Baseline analysis. Finite element creep analysis with different creep models and full non-linear strain-displacement (geometrical) analysis. 2. Critical strain technique. Elastic buckling strain defines the creep buckling strain. 3. Tangent/secant modulus approaches. Combinations of tangent and secant moduli of the isochronous stress-strain curve are used in calculations that reduce to elastic buckling calculations in the elastic case. 4. Use of an isochronous stress-strain curve in a limit/instability analysis of the imperfect structure. An instability (buckling) analysis would be in principle the same as Technique 3, and should generate the same answer. Adding plastic collapse as a failure mode ensures that the yield strength of the structure is not exceeded. This analysis therefore reflects the failure modes which are covered by the baseline technique. | |
| language | English | |
| title | ASME STP-PT-022 | num |
| title | COMPARISON AND VALIDATION OF CREEP-BUCKLING ANALYSIS METHODS | en |
| type | standard | |
| page | 31 | |
| status | Active | |
| tree | ASME - ASME International:;2008 | |
| contenttype | fulltext |

درباره ما