Show simple item record

Lessons Learned - No Audit and Verification Plan Guidance

contributor authorNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
date accessioned2017-09-04T16:33:29Z
date available2017-09-04T16:33:29Z
date copyright41215
date issued2012
identifier otherUUKZAFAAAAAAAAAA.pdf
identifier urihttps://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/96906
description abstractConfiguration Data Management (CDM) requirements should be specified by a Program to allow for proper configuration auditing and verification/validation planning by Projects. Configuration Audit and Verification Requirements (including Functional Configuration Audit & Physical Configuration Audit) were not properly specified within the Constellation Program. This resulted in projects, such as the Ground Operations Project, deciding that the requirements for a Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) and a Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) could be satisfied through a Design Certification Review (DCR). This decision was not fully coordinated across the Constellation Program.
languageEnglish
titleNASA-LLIS-4582num
titleLessons Learned - No Audit and Verification Plan Guidanceen
typestandard
page2
statusActive
treeNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;2012
contenttypefulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record