Show simple item record

Lessons Learned - Establishing formal handling, packaging, and shipping processes

contributor authorNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
date accessioned2017-09-04T16:35:42Z
date available2017-09-04T16:35:42Z
date copyright01/01/2002
date issued2002
identifier otherVAVEQCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf
identifier urihttps://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/99206
description abstractDescription of Driving Event:
A contractor reported that there had been some discrepancies with the shipment of the Robotic Work Stations (RWS). The preliminary discrepancies were lack of shock indicators, improper Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) packaging, and improper packaging of the shipment. A formal investigation was conducted to determine the root cause and corrective actions.
Root cause: The following root causes were identified by the investigation:
1. Packaging instructions for the RWS assemblies were not being followed, as noted through review of the documentation which showed the personnel handling RWS assemblies several times (to correct packaging discrepancies) prior to being accepted by customer. Specifically, the units were not disassembled into components and the cables were not properly coiled and secured. Adequate packaging interface data, information, and description of hardware was not provided in the packaging instructions. Packaging engineering was not informed of names of authorized personnel for coordinating the activities related to packaging engineering, plus the instructions from the vendor were not provided to the packaging engineer.
2. No formal process was established for the organization having custody of the hardware/ software to maintain the Acceptance Data Packages (ADP) for the contractor-furnished equipment (CFE) and government-furnished equipment (GFE) in its possession, although the data required to maintain the ADP was generated in this case.
3. The packaging instructions were subject to interpretation by the user. For example a contractor's receiving inspection documented that temperature monitoring equipment and shock recording equipment were not present upon opening the container. Per the contractor's packaging procedure, these items are not required in the shipping containers but were assumed by the contractor to be required since they are required per NHB 6000.1D for mission critical equipment.
languageEnglish
titleNASA-LLIS-1211num
titleLessons Learned - Establishing formal handling, packaging, and shipping processesen
typestandard
page3
statusActive
treeNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;2002
contenttypefulltext
subject keywordsConfiguration Management
subject keywordsExplosives Handling
subject keywordsFlight Equipment
subject keywordsGround Equipment
subject keywordsHardware
subject keywordsIndependent Verification and Validation
subject keywordsLogistics
subject keywordsPackaging Handling Storage
subject keywordsParts Materials & Processes
subject keywordsPayloads
subject keywordsPolicy & Planning
subject keywordsProcurement Small Business & Industrial Relations
subject keywordsRisk Management/Assessment
subject keywordsSafety & Mission Assurance
subject keywordsSoftware
subject keywordsSpacecraft
subject keywordsTest & Verification
subject keywordsTransportation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record