Show simple item record

Lessons Learned - Programs Selecting Data Management Tools Without Establishing A Technical Data Architecture

contributor authorNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
date accessioned2017-09-04T17:30:13Z
date available2017-09-04T17:30:13Z
date copyright41220
date issued2012
identifier otherCUKZAFAAAAAAAAAA.pdf
identifier urihttp://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/153270
description abstractTechnical data architecture and standards were not defined early in the Constellation Program. Tools, such as Cradle, Windchill (official data repository), IRMA (risk management), Primavera (schedules), etc., were selected without developing the data architecture and requirements for the tools. The Constellation Program prime contracts were put in place without consistent data delivery requirements and data rights being addressed. The prime contractors delivered inconsistent data in various formats and the contractors claimed that certain data was proprietary, making it difficult for the Government to obtain the necessary data in uniform formats.
languageEnglish
titleNASA-LLIS-4578num
titleLessons Learned - Programs Selecting Data Management Tools Without Establishing A Technical Data Architectureen
typestandard
page2
statusActive
treeNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;2012
contenttypefulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record