NASA-LLIS-1213
Lessons Learned – Configuration Control at All Levels of Change
Year: 1999
Abstract: Description of Driving Event:
The trunnion covers used to support Extra-vehicular activity (EVA) were reportedly altered late in the flow of STS-88 preparations. The modification included the addition of a tether point and changing a part number. The part number was used in the EVA checklist to allow the crew to properly determine on which cover to install each trunnion; the changed part number was not picked up for the checklist. This change resulted in confusion during EVA-2. Additionally, the tether point was not included in the NBL mockups.
While implementing this Lessons Learned, it was further reported the change to the trunnion covers developed out of a fit check done at KSC with a VITT representative from the Crew Office in attendance. Velcro was added to the cover to make it fit better per ECP BHE 1780 (Note: the tether points have been in the design of the trunnion covers since June of 1997 although they were not included in the NBL mockup). Additionally, as part of the coordination on this change, photographs of the before and after covers were taken in the Huntsville shop and sent to Houston. This information further underscores the breakdown in the configuration control processes within the program.)
Root cause: Lack of configuration control processes for changes that do not require Program level change requests.
The trunnion covers used to support Extra-vehicular activity (EVA) were reportedly altered late in the flow of STS-88 preparations. The modification included the addition of a tether point and changing a part number. The part number was used in the EVA checklist to allow the crew to properly determine on which cover to install each trunnion; the changed part number was not picked up for the checklist. This change resulted in confusion during EVA-2. Additionally, the tether point was not included in the NBL mockups.
While implementing this Lessons Learned, it was further reported the change to the trunnion covers developed out of a fit check done at KSC with a VITT representative from the Crew Office in attendance. Velcro was added to the cover to make it fit better per ECP BHE 1780 (Note: the tether points have been in the design of the trunnion covers since June of 1997 although they were not included in the NBL mockup). Additionally, as part of the coordination on this change, photographs of the before and after covers were taken in the Huntsville shop and sent to Houston. This information further underscores the breakdown in the configuration control processes within the program.)
Root cause: Lack of configuration control processes for changes that do not require Program level change requests.
Subject: Facilities
Show full item record
| contributor author | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) | |
| date accessioned | 2017-09-04T18:04:23Z | |
| date available | 2017-09-04T18:04:23Z | |
| date copyright | 06/07/1999 | |
| date issued | 1999 | |
| identifier other | GGVEQCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yse.yabesh.ir/std;jsery=autho162s7D8308/handle/yse/187331 | |
| description abstract | Description of Driving Event: The trunnion covers used to support Extra-vehicular activity (EVA) were reportedly altered late in the flow of STS-88 preparations. The modification included the addition of a tether point and changing a part number. The part number was used in the EVA checklist to allow the crew to properly determine on which cover to install each trunnion; the changed part number was not picked up for the checklist. This change resulted in confusion during EVA-2. Additionally, the tether point was not included in the NBL mockups. While implementing this Lessons Learned, it was further reported the change to the trunnion covers developed out of a fit check done at KSC with a VITT representative from the Crew Office in attendance. Velcro was added to the cover to make it fit better per ECP BHE 1780 (Note: the tether points have been in the design of the trunnion covers since June of 1997 although they were not included in the NBL mockup). Additionally, as part of the coordination on this change, photographs of the before and after covers were taken in the Huntsville shop and sent to Houston. This information further underscores the breakdown in the configuration control processes within the program.) Root cause: Lack of configuration control processes for changes that do not require Program level change requests. | |
| language | English | |
| title | NASA-LLIS-1213 | num |
| title | Lessons Learned – Configuration Control at All Levels of Change | en |
| type | standard | |
| page | 3 | |
| status | Active | |
| tree | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;1999 | |
| contenttype | fulltext | |
| subject keywords | Facilities | |
| subject keywords | Flight Equipment | |
| subject keywords | Flight Operations | |
| subject keywords | Ground Equipment | |
| subject keywords | Ground Operations | |
| subject keywords | Hardware | |
| subject keywords | Independent Verification and Validation | |
| subject keywords | Industrial Operations | |
| subject keywords | Parts Materials & Processes | |
| subject keywords | Policy & Planning | |
| subject keywords | Risk Management/Assessment | |
| subject keywords | Safety & Mission Assurance | |
| subject keywords | Software | |
| subject keywords | Spacecraft | |
| subject keywords | Test & Verification | |
| subject keywords | Test Article | |
| subject keywords | Test Facility |

درباره ما