MIL-STD-46855A
HUMAN ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR MILITARY SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, AND FACILITIES
Organization:
ARMY - MI - Aviation & Missile Command
Year: 2011
Abstract: This standard establishes and defines the requirements for applying human engineering to the design, development, and acquisition of military systems, equipment, and facilities. These requirements include the work to be accomplished in conducting a human engineering effort integrated with the total system engineering and development effort. These requirements are the basis for including human engineering in proposals; system, equipment, software and associated user interfaces, and facility analysis, design and test; and documentation and reporting.
Applicability. This standard applies to the acquisition of military systems, equipment, and facilities. It is intended that these requirements be tailored to address the needs of each individual program or program phase.Intended Use: This standard is intended for use to specify human engineering tasking requirements for military systems, equipment, and facilities, cited contractually in statements of work. It may be invoked in its entirety or selectively as prescribed by the procuring activity. The primary use of this standard for procurement does not necessarily preclude its utilization for inhouse efforts, where desired. Compliance with this standard will provide the procuring activity with assurance of positive management control of the human engineering effort required in the design, development, and acquisition of military systems, equipment, and facilities. Specifically, it is intended to ensure that: a. system requirements are achieved by consideration of the capabilities and limitations of the human component; b. through proper design of equipment, software and associated user interfaces, and environment, the personnel-equipment-software combination meets system performance goals; c. design features will not constitute an undue hazard to personnel; d. trade-off points between automated versus manual operation have been chosen for peak system effectiveness within appropriate cost limits; e. the application of human engineering principles to system design is technically adequate; f. the equipment is designed to facilitate required maintenance; g. procedures for operating and maintaining equipment are efficient, reliable, and safe; h. potential error-inducing equipment design features are minimized; and i. the layout of the facility and the arrangement of equipment affords efficient communication and use.
Applicability. This standard applies to the acquisition of military systems, equipment, and facilities. It is intended that these requirements be tailored to address the needs of each individual program or program phase.Intended Use: This standard is intended for use to specify human engineering tasking requirements for military systems, equipment, and facilities, cited contractually in statements of work. It may be invoked in its entirety or selectively as prescribed by the procuring activity. The primary use of this standard for procurement does not necessarily preclude its utilization for inhouse efforts, where desired. Compliance with this standard will provide the procuring activity with assurance of positive management control of the human engineering effort required in the design, development, and acquisition of military systems, equipment, and facilities. Specifically, it is intended to ensure that: a. system requirements are achieved by consideration of the capabilities and limitations of the human component; b. through proper design of equipment, software and associated user interfaces, and environment, the personnel-equipment-software combination meets system performance goals; c. design features will not constitute an undue hazard to personnel; d. trade-off points between automated versus manual operation have been chosen for peak system effectiveness within appropriate cost limits; e. the application of human engineering principles to system design is technically adequate; f. the equipment is designed to facilitate required maintenance; g. procedures for operating and maintaining equipment are efficient, reliable, and safe; h. potential error-inducing equipment design features are minimized; and i. the layout of the facility and the arrangement of equipment affords efficient communication and use.
Subject: Analysis
Collections
:
Show full item record
contributor author | ARMY - MI - Aviation & Missile Command | |
date accessioned | 2017-09-04T15:06:48Z | |
date available | 2017-09-04T15:06:48Z | |
date copyright | 05/24/2011 | |
date issued | 2011 | |
identifier other | LFVKMEAAAAAAAAAA.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yse.yabesh.ir/std;jsessionid=47037D83FCDCAC426159DD6E273C9FCD/handle/yse/4373 | |
description abstract | This standard establishes and defines the requirements for applying human engineering to the design, development, and acquisition of military systems, equipment, and facilities. These requirements include the work to be accomplished in conducting a human engineering effort integrated with the total system engineering and development effort. These requirements are the basis for including human engineering in proposals; system, equipment, software and associated user interfaces, and facility analysis, design and test; and documentation and reporting. Applicability. This standard applies to the acquisition of military systems, equipment, and facilities. It is intended that these requirements be tailored to address the needs of each individual program or program phase.Intended Use: This standard is intended for use to specify human engineering tasking requirements for military systems, equipment, and facilities, cited contractually in statements of work. It may be invoked in its entirety or selectively as prescribed by the procuring activity. The primary use of this standard for procurement does not necessarily preclude its utilization for inhouse efforts, where desired. Compliance with this standard will provide the procuring activity with assurance of positive management control of the human engineering effort required in the design, development, and acquisition of military systems, equipment, and facilities. Specifically, it is intended to ensure that: a. system requirements are achieved by consideration of the capabilities and limitations of the human component; b. through proper design of equipment, software and associated user interfaces, and environment, the personnel-equipment-software combination meets system performance goals; c. design features will not constitute an undue hazard to personnel; d. trade-off points between automated versus manual operation have been chosen for peak system effectiveness within appropriate cost limits; e. the application of human engineering principles to system design is technically adequate; f. the equipment is designed to facilitate required maintenance; g. procedures for operating and maintaining equipment are efficient, reliable, and safe; h. potential error-inducing equipment design features are minimized; and i. the layout of the facility and the arrangement of equipment affords efficient communication and use. | |
language | English | |
title | MIL-STD-46855A | num |
title | HUMAN ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR MILITARY SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, AND FACILITIES | en |
type | standard | |
page | 28 | |
status | Active | |
tree | ARMY - MI - Aviation & Missile Command:;2011 | |
contenttype | fulltext | |
subject keywords | Analysis | |
subject keywords | Design and development | |
subject keywords | Dynamic simulation | |
subject keywords | Equipment procedures | |
subject keywords | Mockups | |
subject keywords | dynamic | |
subject keywords | Mockups | |
subject keywords | three-dimensional | |
subject keywords | Models | |
subject keywords | computer | |
subject keywords | Models | |
subject keywords | scale | |
subject keywords | Simulators | |
subject keywords | engineering | |
subject keywords | Task analysis | |
subject keywords | Task taxonomy | |
subject keywords | Test and evaluation | |
subject keywords | Work environment | |
subject keywords | Workload analysis |