• 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • درباره ما
  • درخواست موردی
  • فهرست استانداردها
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • راهنما
  • Login
  • لیست خرید شما 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
View Item 
  •   YSE
  • Industrial Standards
  • AIAA - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
  • View Item
  •   YSE
  • Industrial Standards
  • AIAA - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
  • View Item
  • All Fields
  • Title(or Doc Num)
  • Organization
  • Year
  • Subject
Advanced Search
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Archive

AIAA S-102.2.11

Performance-Based Anomaly Detection and Response Analysis

Organization:
AIAA - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Year: 2009

Abstract: This standard establishes uniform requirements and criteria for a performance-based anomaly detection and response (ADR) analysis process. The performance-based aspect of this standard requires that the organizationʼs ADR analysis capability be rated according to predetermined criteria for process capability and data maturity.
Purpose
The primary purpose of the ADR analysis is to develop identification and response methods for system anomalies or faults that pose unacceptable risk. Depending on how it is performed, an ADR analysis can be used to develop different types of ADR systems. For this standard, an ADR system is defined as an established function for detecting, verifying, isolating, and responding to a specified set of system functional failure modes. The minimum activities that constitute the baseline practice for ADR analysis are the following:
— timely establishment of ADR system requirements and design criteria that meet the userʼs needs;
— timely establishment of ADR analysis technical performance metrics (TPM);
— timely collection and evaluation of necessary engineering information [e.g., signal lists, specs, interface control drawing (ICD), test data, operational data, schematics, and product failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA)] to identify all functional failure modes that pose unacceptable risk;
— timely creation of a functional failure analysis (FFA) dataset that defines the detection, verification, isolation, and response methods, as applicable, for each identified functional failure mode;
— timely validation of each FFA dataset; and
— timely documentation of the ADR Analysis. The FFA is a systematic methodology for identifying and responding to functional failure modes that require such actions as defined by the FMECA or other failure analysis such as system test; failure reporting, analysis, and corrective action system (FRACAS); system safety; or risk management.
URI: http://yse.yabesh.ir/std;jsessionid=5419487D58F372296210253C48C0B568/handle/yse/108777
Collections :
  • AIAA - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
  • Download PDF : (742.6Kb)
  • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
  • Statistics

    AIAA S-102.2.11

Show full item record

contributor authorAIAA - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
date accessioned2017-09-04T16:45:29Z
date available2017-09-04T16:45:29Z
date copyright2009.01.01
date issued2009
identifier otherVZSNLCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf
identifier urihttp://yse.yabesh.ir/std;jsessionid=5419487D58F372296210253C48C0B568/handle/yse/108777
description abstractThis standard establishes uniform requirements and criteria for a performance-based anomaly detection and response (ADR) analysis process. The performance-based aspect of this standard requires that the organizationʼs ADR analysis capability be rated according to predetermined criteria for process capability and data maturity.
Purpose
The primary purpose of the ADR analysis is to develop identification and response methods for system anomalies or faults that pose unacceptable risk. Depending on how it is performed, an ADR analysis can be used to develop different types of ADR systems. For this standard, an ADR system is defined as an established function for detecting, verifying, isolating, and responding to a specified set of system functional failure modes. The minimum activities that constitute the baseline practice for ADR analysis are the following:
— timely establishment of ADR system requirements and design criteria that meet the userʼs needs;
— timely establishment of ADR analysis technical performance metrics (TPM);
— timely collection and evaluation of necessary engineering information [e.g., signal lists, specs, interface control drawing (ICD), test data, operational data, schematics, and product failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA)] to identify all functional failure modes that pose unacceptable risk;
— timely creation of a functional failure analysis (FFA) dataset that defines the detection, verification, isolation, and response methods, as applicable, for each identified functional failure mode;
— timely validation of each FFA dataset; and
— timely documentation of the ADR Analysis. The FFA is a systematic methodology for identifying and responding to functional failure modes that require such actions as defined by the FMECA or other failure analysis such as system test; failure reporting, analysis, and corrective action system (FRACAS); system safety; or risk management.
languageEnglish
titleAIAA S-102.2.11num
titlePerformance-Based Anomaly Detection and Response Analysisen
typestandard
page30
statusActive
treeAIAA - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics:;2009
contenttypefulltext
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian
 
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian