• 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • درباره ما
  • درخواست موردی
  • فهرست استانداردها
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • راهنما
  • Login
  • لیست خرید شما 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
View Item 
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • AIR FORCE - 71 - Air Force Sustainment Center - Oklahoma City
  • View Item
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • AIR FORCE - 71 - Air Force Sustainment Center - Oklahoma City
  • View Item
  • All Fields
  • Title(or Doc Num)
  • Organization
  • Year
  • Subject
Advanced Search
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Archive

MIL-HDBK-217F CHG NOTICE 2

RELIABILITY PREDICTION OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT

Organization:
AIR FORCE - 71 - Air Force Sustainment Center - Oklahoma City
Year: 1995

Abstract: Purpose – This handbook is for guidance only and shall not be cited as a requirement. If it is, the contractor does not have to comply. The purpose of this handbook is to establish and maintain consistent and uniform methods for estimating the inherent reliability (ie., the reliability of a mature design) of military electronic equipment and systems. It provides a common basis for reliability predictions of related or competitive designs. The handbook is intended to be used as a tool to increase the reliability of the equipment being designed.
Application – This handbook contains two methods of reliability prediction – "Part Stress Analysis" in Sections 5 through 23 and "Parts Count" in Appendix A. These methods vary in degree of information needed to apply them. The Part Stress Analysis Method requires a greater amount of detailed information and is applicable during the later design phase when actual hardware and circuits are being designed. The Parts Count Method requires less information, generally part quantities, quality level, and the application environment. This method is applicable during the early design phase and during proposal formulation. In general, the Parts Count Method will usually result in a more conservative estimate (i.e., higher failure rate) of system reliability than the Parts Stress Method.
URI: http://yse.yabesh.ir/std;query=autho1826ear3FCDCAC426159DD6EFDEC014A/handle/yse/85017
Collections :
  • AIR FORCE - 71 - Air Force Sustainment Center - Oklahoma City
  • Download PDF : (5.776Mb)
  • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
  • Statistics

    MIL-HDBK-217F CHG NOTICE 2

Show full item record

contributor authorAIR FORCE - 71 - Air Force Sustainment Center - Oklahoma City
date accessioned2017-09-04T16:21:34Z
date available2017-09-04T16:21:34Z
date copyright02/28/1995
date issued1995
identifier otherTNWYDAAAAAAAAAAA.pdf
identifier urihttp://yse.yabesh.ir/std;query=autho1826ear3FCDCAC426159DD6EFDEC014A/handle/yse/85017
description abstractPurpose – This handbook is for guidance only and shall not be cited as a requirement. If it is, the contractor does not have to comply. The purpose of this handbook is to establish and maintain consistent and uniform methods for estimating the inherent reliability (ie., the reliability of a mature design) of military electronic equipment and systems. It provides a common basis for reliability predictions of related or competitive designs. The handbook is intended to be used as a tool to increase the reliability of the equipment being designed.
Application – This handbook contains two methods of reliability prediction – "Part Stress Analysis" in Sections 5 through 23 and "Parts Count" in Appendix A. These methods vary in degree of information needed to apply them. The Part Stress Analysis Method requires a greater amount of detailed information and is applicable during the later design phase when actual hardware and circuits are being designed. The Parts Count Method requires less information, generally part quantities, quality level, and the application environment. This method is applicable during the early design phase and during proposal formulation. In general, the Parts Count Method will usually result in a more conservative estimate (i.e., higher failure rate) of system reliability than the Parts Stress Method.
languageEnglish
titleMIL-HDBK-217F CHG NOTICE 2num
titleRELIABILITY PREDICTION OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENTen
typestandard
page150
statusActive
treeAIR FORCE - 71 - Air Force Sustainment Center - Oklahoma City:;1995
contenttypefulltext
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian
 
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian