درباره ما
NASA-LLIS-1087
Lessons Learned - Plan Timely Implementation of Backups In Case Breakthrough Technologies Fail to Meet Readiness Gates - 1998
Year: 2001
Abstract: Abstract:
Although the Deep Space 1 mission exceeded its overall technology demonstration objectives, certain important technologies under development never achieved flight readiness.
Develop a project implementation plan with preplanned alternatives that addresses technology readiness and risk mitigation. Cease development when technology readiness gates for critical technologies are not met and implement preplanned alternatives. Avoid a spacecraft architecture where one new technology relies on another in order to demonstrate them in-flight.
Although the Deep Space 1 mission exceeded its overall technology demonstration objectives, certain important technologies under development never achieved flight readiness.
Develop a project implementation plan with preplanned alternatives that addresses technology readiness and risk mitigation. Cease development when technology readiness gates for critical technologies are not met and implement preplanned alternatives. Avoid a spacecraft architecture where one new technology relies on another in order to demonstrate them in-flight.
Subject: Autonomous Navigation
Show full item record
| contributor author | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) | |
| date accessioned | 2017-09-04T18:39:18Z | |
| date available | 2017-09-04T18:39:18Z | |
| date copyright | 37231 | |
| date issued | 2001 | |
| identifier other | JRUEQCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yse.yabesh.ir/std;query=autho47037D839D40AC4/handle/yse/220980 | |
| description abstract | Abstract: Although the Deep Space 1 mission exceeded its overall technology demonstration objectives, certain important technologies under development never achieved flight readiness. Develop a project implementation plan with preplanned alternatives that addresses technology readiness and risk mitigation. Cease development when technology readiness gates for critical technologies are not met and implement preplanned alternatives. Avoid a spacecraft architecture where one new technology relies on another in order to demonstrate them in-flight. | |
| language | English | |
| title | NASA-LLIS-1087 | num |
| title | Lessons Learned - Plan Timely Implementation of Backups In Case Breakthrough Technologies Fail to Meet Readiness Gates - 1998 | en |
| type | standard | |
| page | 3 | |
| status | Active | |
| tree | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;2001 | |
| contenttype | fulltext | |
| subject keywords | Autonomous Navigation | |
| subject keywords | Flight Equipment | |
| subject keywords | Flight Qualification | |
| subject keywords | Hardware | |
| subject keywords | Management and Planning | |
| subject keywords | Policy & Planning | |
| subject keywords | Risk Management/Assessment | |
| subject keywords | Safety & Mission Assurance | |
| subject keywords | Spacecraft | |
| subject keywords | Technology Plan | |
| subject keywords | Technology Readiness Level | |
| subject keywords | Test & Verification |