• 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • درباره ما
  • درخواست موردی
  • فهرست استانداردها
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • راهنما
  • Login
  • لیست خرید شما 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
View Item 
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • View Item
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • View Item
  • All Fields
  • Title(or Doc Num)
  • Organization
  • Year
  • Subject
Advanced Search
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Archive

NASA-LLIS-0008

Lessons Learned - Hazard Criticality in the Design and Manufacture of and the Selection of Materials for use in High Pressure Gaseous Flow Systems (Oxygen)

Organization:
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Year: 1991

Abstract: Description of Driving Event:
A flash fire occurred during a performance record test of the shuttle Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU). This fire occurred when a shutoff valve was opened, supplying 6,500 psi oxygen to the EMU. Ignition occurred and a very high temperature oxygen- rich aluminum fire ensued. The shutoff valve melted in the fire, relieving the system pressure and causing the metallic fire to extinguish. Residual fires were extinguished using carbon dioxide extinguishers. A finding of the mishap investigation board was that the most probable ignition site was within the regulator module in a flow restrictor. This flow restrictor consists of two drilled passages, which intersect in a "V" shape. Manufacturing practices allow some overdrill at the intersection of these two passages, which may have formed a stagnant volume at the base of the "V". This stagnant volume allows compression heating (adiabatic compression detonation) and/or shock heating, which ruptured and ignited a thin section of aluminum and spread to the other metallic components of the module in the oxygen enriched atmosphere. Other possible ignition mechanisms included (in priority order):
A. Compression and/or shock heating of contaminant(s) entrapped in the stagnant volume of the flow restrictor (all five other regulators disassembled and inspected showed some particulate debris within the system).
B. Mechanical heating of or by particulate contamination impinging on a surface.
C. Compression and/or shock heating of one of the silastic o-rings in the shutoff assembly.
Testing at White Sands Test Facility was unable to duplicate these events in over 2200 attempts or confirm any of these ignition mechanisms.
URI: https://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/109215
Subject: Extra-Vehicular Activity
Collections :
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • Download PDF : (14.90Kb)
  • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
  • Statistics

    NASA-LLIS-0008

Show full item record

contributor authorNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
date accessioned2017-09-04T16:45:58Z
date available2017-09-04T16:45:58Z
date copyright06/10/1991
date issued1991
identifier otherWAYCQCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf
identifier urihttps://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/109215
description abstractDescription of Driving Event:
A flash fire occurred during a performance record test of the shuttle Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU). This fire occurred when a shutoff valve was opened, supplying 6,500 psi oxygen to the EMU. Ignition occurred and a very high temperature oxygen- rich aluminum fire ensued. The shutoff valve melted in the fire, relieving the system pressure and causing the metallic fire to extinguish. Residual fires were extinguished using carbon dioxide extinguishers. A finding of the mishap investigation board was that the most probable ignition site was within the regulator module in a flow restrictor. This flow restrictor consists of two drilled passages, which intersect in a "V" shape. Manufacturing practices allow some overdrill at the intersection of these two passages, which may have formed a stagnant volume at the base of the "V". This stagnant volume allows compression heating (adiabatic compression detonation) and/or shock heating, which ruptured and ignited a thin section of aluminum and spread to the other metallic components of the module in the oxygen enriched atmosphere. Other possible ignition mechanisms included (in priority order):
A. Compression and/or shock heating of contaminant(s) entrapped in the stagnant volume of the flow restrictor (all five other regulators disassembled and inspected showed some particulate debris within the system).
B. Mechanical heating of or by particulate contamination impinging on a surface.
C. Compression and/or shock heating of one of the silastic o-rings in the shutoff assembly.
Testing at White Sands Test Facility was unable to duplicate these events in over 2200 attempts or confirm any of these ignition mechanisms.
languageEnglish
titleNASA-LLIS-0008num
titleLessons Learned - Hazard Criticality in the Design and Manufacture of and the Selection of Materials for use in High Pressure Gaseous Flow Systems (Oxygen)en
typestandard
page3
statusActive
treeNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;1991
contenttypefulltext
subject keywordsExtra-Vehicular Activity
subject keywordsParts Materials & Processes
subject keywordsPressure Vessels
subject keywordsTest & Verification
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian
 
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian