درباره ما
NASA-LLIS-1413
Lessons Learned – Dissenting Opinions and Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Process
Year: 2004
Abstract: Abstract:
The NASA Engineering & Safety Center (NESC) received a dissenting opinion describing aerodynamic concerns leading to a potential loss of vehicle control that would result in a failure to achieve mission objectives. Working in conjunction with the X-43A project, the NESC ensured that the aerodynamic issues were properly addressed through the existing independent Flight Readiness Review (FRR) process. The role of the NESC was to confirm that the independent FRR committee adequately reviewed, investigated and responded to the dissenting opinion.
The NASA Engineering & Safety Center (NESC) received a dissenting opinion describing aerodynamic concerns leading to a potential loss of vehicle control that would result in a failure to achieve mission objectives. Working in conjunction with the X-43A project, the NESC ensured that the aerodynamic issues were properly addressed through the existing independent Flight Readiness Review (FRR) process. The role of the NESC was to confirm that the independent FRR committee adequately reviewed, investigated and responded to the dissenting opinion.
Subject: Administration/Organization
Show full item record
| contributor author | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) | |
| date accessioned | 2017-09-04T16:48:40Z | |
| date available | 2017-09-04T16:48:40Z | |
| date copyright | 03/18/2004 | |
| date issued | 2004 | |
| identifier other | WIWEQCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf | |
| identifier uri | https://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/112144 | |
| description abstract | Abstract: The NASA Engineering & Safety Center (NESC) received a dissenting opinion describing aerodynamic concerns leading to a potential loss of vehicle control that would result in a failure to achieve mission objectives. Working in conjunction with the X-43A project, the NESC ensured that the aerodynamic issues were properly addressed through the existing independent Flight Readiness Review (FRR) process. The role of the NESC was to confirm that the independent FRR committee adequately reviewed, investigated and responded to the dissenting opinion. | |
| language | English | |
| title | NASA-LLIS-1413 | num |
| title | Lessons Learned – Dissenting Opinions and Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Process | en |
| type | standard | |
| page | 4 | |
| status | Active | |
| tree | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;2004 | |
| contenttype | fulltext | |
| subject keywords | Administration/Organization | |
| subject keywords | Configuration Management | |
| subject keywords | Flight Equipment | |
| subject keywords | Flight Operations | |
| subject keywords | Ground Equipment | |
| subject keywords | Ground Operations | |
| subject keywords | Hardware | |
| subject keywords | Independent Verification and Validation | |
| subject keywords | Launch Process | |
| subject keywords | Policy & Planning | |
| subject keywords | Program and Project Management | |
| subject keywords | Risk Management/Assessment | |
| subject keywords | Safety & Mission Assurance | |
| subject keywords | Spacecraft |