• 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • درباره ما
  • درخواست موردی
  • فهرست استانداردها
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • راهنما
  • Login
  • لیست خرید شما 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
View Item 
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • View Item
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • View Item
  • All Fields
  • Title(or Doc Num)
  • Organization
  • Year
  • Subject
Advanced Search
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Archive

NASA-LLIS-1208

Lessons Learned – Use of "can't fail" process to reduce chances for operator erro

Organization:
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Year: 1999

Abstract: Description of Driving Event:
A functional test was being performed at one of the subcontractors on Pressure Transducers. The physical setup consisted of a supply pressure bottle connected to a pressure manifold (with 4 pressure transducers installed) and to a test console. The objective of the functional test was to ensure that at various pressures the pressure transducers were within allowable tolerance. The system was to be pressurized to 400 psi (line pressure), then a 40 psi differential pressure applied to the transducers.
• The technician applied 15 VDC voltage to the pressure standard. This is below required voltage. 
• Next, he increased the line pressure expecting an indication from the pressure standard. However, as the pressure increased, the input voltage to the pressure standard dropped from 15 VDC to 11 VDC. At 11 VDC the standard is not able to function due to the low voltage and therefore no increase in pressure was indicated.
• The technician had no indication that pressure buildup was exceeding the allowable limit for the transducers. 
• Overpressurization damaged the diaphragms in the pressure transducers.
Root cause: Human error.
a. Technician applied incorrect input voltage to the pressure standard. As a result the pressure standard failed to indicate the actual line pressure.
b. Technician failed to limit the source pressure. He failed to set the bottle pressure regulator to 440 psi. This would have ensured that the transducers could not be subjected to a pressure exceeding their proof pressure.
c. Contributing Causes:
1. Inadequate training in use of test equipment. Although the technician had received onthe- job-training in test procedures and use of lab equipment, the technician was unaware of the hazardous consequences should the pressure standard be starved for current.
2. Adequate failure tolerance (Can\'t Fail) was not required to be built into the procedure.
3. Required input voltage was not readily available. Since this incident the input voltage requirements for the pressure standard have been added to the calibration sheet with a warning to the technicians. In addition the input voltage requirements have been stenciled, as a warning to technicians, in large red letters, directly to the standard.
URI: https://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/12332
Subject: Computer-Aided Design/Manufacturing/Engineering
Collections :
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • Download PDF : (15.23Kb)
  • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
  • Statistics

    NASA-LLIS-1208

Show full item record

contributor authorNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
date accessioned2017-09-04T15:13:39Z
date available2017-09-04T15:13:39Z
date copyright1999.07.23
date issued1999
identifier otherMAVEQCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf
identifier urihttps://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/12332
description abstractDescription of Driving Event:
A functional test was being performed at one of the subcontractors on Pressure Transducers. The physical setup consisted of a supply pressure bottle connected to a pressure manifold (with 4 pressure transducers installed) and to a test console. The objective of the functional test was to ensure that at various pressures the pressure transducers were within allowable tolerance. The system was to be pressurized to 400 psi (line pressure), then a 40 psi differential pressure applied to the transducers.
• The technician applied 15 VDC voltage to the pressure standard. This is below required voltage. 
• Next, he increased the line pressure expecting an indication from the pressure standard. However, as the pressure increased, the input voltage to the pressure standard dropped from 15 VDC to 11 VDC. At 11 VDC the standard is not able to function due to the low voltage and therefore no increase in pressure was indicated.
• The technician had no indication that pressure buildup was exceeding the allowable limit for the transducers. 
• Overpressurization damaged the diaphragms in the pressure transducers.
Root cause: Human error.
a. Technician applied incorrect input voltage to the pressure standard. As a result the pressure standard failed to indicate the actual line pressure.
b. Technician failed to limit the source pressure. He failed to set the bottle pressure regulator to 440 psi. This would have ensured that the transducers could not be subjected to a pressure exceeding their proof pressure.
c. Contributing Causes:
1. Inadequate training in use of test equipment. Although the technician had received onthe- job-training in test procedures and use of lab equipment, the technician was unaware of the hazardous consequences should the pressure standard be starved for current.
2. Adequate failure tolerance (Can\'t Fail) was not required to be built into the procedure.
3. Required input voltage was not readily available. Since this incident the input voltage requirements for the pressure standard have been added to the calibration sheet with a warning to the technicians. In addition the input voltage requirements have been stenciled, as a warning to technicians, in large red letters, directly to the standard.
languageEnglish
titleNASA-LLIS-1208num
titleLessons Learned – Use of "can't fail" process to reduce chances for operator erroen
typestandard
page3
statusActive
treeNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;1999
contenttypefulltext
subject keywordsComputer-Aided Design/Manufacturing/Engineering
subject keywordsConfiguration Management
subject keywordsFlight Equipment
subject keywordsFlight Operations
subject keywordsGround Equipment
subject keywordsGround Operations
subject keywordsHardware
subject keywordsHuman Factors
subject keywordsIndustrial Operations
subject keywordsLaunch Process
subject keywordsParts Materials & Processes
subject keywordsPayloads
subject keywordsPolicy & Planning
subject keywordsRisk Management/Assessment
subject keywordsSafety & Mission Assurance
subject keywordsSoftware
subject keywordsSpacecraft
subject keywordsTest & Verification
subject keywordsTest Article
subject keywordsTest Facility
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian
 
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian