NASA-LLIS-1208
Lessons Learned – Use of "can't fail" process to reduce chances for operator erro
Year: 1999
Abstract: Description of Driving Event:
A functional test was being performed at one of the subcontractors on Pressure Transducers. The physical setup consisted of a supply pressure bottle connected to a pressure manifold (with 4 pressure transducers installed) and to a test console. The objective of the functional test was to ensure that at various pressures the pressure transducers were within allowable tolerance. The system was to be pressurized to 400 psi (line pressure), then a 40 psi differential pressure applied to the transducers.
• The technician applied 15 VDC voltage to the pressure standard. This is below required voltage.
• Next, he increased the line pressure expecting an indication from the pressure standard. However, as the pressure increased, the input voltage to the pressure standard dropped from 15 VDC to 11 VDC. At 11 VDC the standard is not able to function due to the low voltage and therefore no increase in pressure was indicated.
• The technician had no indication that pressure buildup was exceeding the allowable limit for the transducers.
• Overpressurization damaged the diaphragms in the pressure transducers.
Root cause: Human error.
a. Technician applied incorrect input voltage to the pressure standard. As a result the pressure standard failed to indicate the actual line pressure.
b. Technician failed to limit the source pressure. He failed to set the bottle pressure regulator to 440 psi. This would have ensured that the transducers could not be subjected to a pressure exceeding their proof pressure.
c. Contributing Causes:
1. Inadequate training in use of test equipment. Although the technician had received onthe- job-training in test procedures and use of lab equipment, the technician was unaware of the hazardous consequences should the pressure standard be starved for current.
2. Adequate failure tolerance (Can\'t Fail) was not required to be built into the procedure.
3. Required input voltage was not readily available. Since this incident the input voltage requirements for the pressure standard have been added to the calibration sheet with a warning to the technicians. In addition the input voltage requirements have been stenciled, as a warning to technicians, in large red letters, directly to the standard.
A functional test was being performed at one of the subcontractors on Pressure Transducers. The physical setup consisted of a supply pressure bottle connected to a pressure manifold (with 4 pressure transducers installed) and to a test console. The objective of the functional test was to ensure that at various pressures the pressure transducers were within allowable tolerance. The system was to be pressurized to 400 psi (line pressure), then a 40 psi differential pressure applied to the transducers.
• The technician applied 15 VDC voltage to the pressure standard. This is below required voltage.
• Next, he increased the line pressure expecting an indication from the pressure standard. However, as the pressure increased, the input voltage to the pressure standard dropped from 15 VDC to 11 VDC. At 11 VDC the standard is not able to function due to the low voltage and therefore no increase in pressure was indicated.
• The technician had no indication that pressure buildup was exceeding the allowable limit for the transducers.
• Overpressurization damaged the diaphragms in the pressure transducers.
Root cause: Human error.
a. Technician applied incorrect input voltage to the pressure standard. As a result the pressure standard failed to indicate the actual line pressure.
b. Technician failed to limit the source pressure. He failed to set the bottle pressure regulator to 440 psi. This would have ensured that the transducers could not be subjected to a pressure exceeding their proof pressure.
c. Contributing Causes:
1. Inadequate training in use of test equipment. Although the technician had received onthe- job-training in test procedures and use of lab equipment, the technician was unaware of the hazardous consequences should the pressure standard be starved for current.
2. Adequate failure tolerance (Can\'t Fail) was not required to be built into the procedure.
3. Required input voltage was not readily available. Since this incident the input voltage requirements for the pressure standard have been added to the calibration sheet with a warning to the technicians. In addition the input voltage requirements have been stenciled, as a warning to technicians, in large red letters, directly to the standard.
Subject: Computer-Aided Design/Manufacturing/Engineering
Show full item record
| contributor author | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) | |
| date accessioned | 2017-09-04T15:13:39Z | |
| date available | 2017-09-04T15:13:39Z | |
| date copyright | 1999.07.23 | |
| date issued | 1999 | |
| identifier other | MAVEQCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf | |
| identifier uri | https://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/12332 | |
| description abstract | Description of Driving Event: A functional test was being performed at one of the subcontractors on Pressure Transducers. The physical setup consisted of a supply pressure bottle connected to a pressure manifold (with 4 pressure transducers installed) and to a test console. The objective of the functional test was to ensure that at various pressures the pressure transducers were within allowable tolerance. The system was to be pressurized to 400 psi (line pressure), then a 40 psi differential pressure applied to the transducers. • The technician applied 15 VDC voltage to the pressure standard. This is below required voltage. • Next, he increased the line pressure expecting an indication from the pressure standard. However, as the pressure increased, the input voltage to the pressure standard dropped from 15 VDC to 11 VDC. At 11 VDC the standard is not able to function due to the low voltage and therefore no increase in pressure was indicated. • The technician had no indication that pressure buildup was exceeding the allowable limit for the transducers. • Overpressurization damaged the diaphragms in the pressure transducers. Root cause: Human error. a. Technician applied incorrect input voltage to the pressure standard. As a result the pressure standard failed to indicate the actual line pressure. b. Technician failed to limit the source pressure. He failed to set the bottle pressure regulator to 440 psi. This would have ensured that the transducers could not be subjected to a pressure exceeding their proof pressure. c. Contributing Causes: 1. Inadequate training in use of test equipment. Although the technician had received onthe- job-training in test procedures and use of lab equipment, the technician was unaware of the hazardous consequences should the pressure standard be starved for current. 2. Adequate failure tolerance (Can\'t Fail) was not required to be built into the procedure. 3. Required input voltage was not readily available. Since this incident the input voltage requirements for the pressure standard have been added to the calibration sheet with a warning to the technicians. In addition the input voltage requirements have been stenciled, as a warning to technicians, in large red letters, directly to the standard. | |
| language | English | |
| title | NASA-LLIS-1208 | num |
| title | Lessons Learned – Use of "can't fail" process to reduce chances for operator erro | en |
| type | standard | |
| page | 3 | |
| status | Active | |
| tree | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;1999 | |
| contenttype | fulltext | |
| subject keywords | Computer-Aided Design/Manufacturing/Engineering | |
| subject keywords | Configuration Management | |
| subject keywords | Flight Equipment | |
| subject keywords | Flight Operations | |
| subject keywords | Ground Equipment | |
| subject keywords | Ground Operations | |
| subject keywords | Hardware | |
| subject keywords | Human Factors | |
| subject keywords | Industrial Operations | |
| subject keywords | Launch Process | |
| subject keywords | Parts Materials & Processes | |
| subject keywords | Payloads | |
| subject keywords | Policy & Planning | |
| subject keywords | Risk Management/Assessment | |
| subject keywords | Safety & Mission Assurance | |
| subject keywords | Software | |
| subject keywords | Spacecraft | |
| subject keywords | Test & Verification | |
| subject keywords | Test Article | |
| subject keywords | Test Facility |

درباره ما