NASA-LLIS-1835
Lessons Learned - Capture of Apollo Lunar Module Reliability Lessons Learned: Reliability Engineering
Year: 2007
Abstract: Abstract:
A July 2007 workshop attended by the former Grumman Corporation's Apollo Lunar Module Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Team and Constellation Program personnel traced the success of the Apollo Lunar Module (LM) to reliability features that were locked into an early stage of LM design. The LM prime contractor (Grumman Corporation) and NASA shared responsibility for system reliability, provided for early Reliability Engineering involvement in evaluating design alternatives at the cross-Apollo system level, placed great emphasis on identification and elimination of critical single point failures, provided for extensive design redundancy, conducted parallel development of alternative technologies, tested critical hardware beyond qualification levels to the point of failure, and performed rigorous root cause analysis of failures. The Grumman retirees also recommended active management of design margins, providing the lunar lander with generous instrumentation and telemetry capabilities, and furnishing a strong Lander advocate during CEV design.
A July 2007 workshop attended by the former Grumman Corporation's Apollo Lunar Module Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Team and Constellation Program personnel traced the success of the Apollo Lunar Module (LM) to reliability features that were locked into an early stage of LM design. The LM prime contractor (Grumman Corporation) and NASA shared responsibility for system reliability, provided for early Reliability Engineering involvement in evaluating design alternatives at the cross-Apollo system level, placed great emphasis on identification and elimination of critical single point failures, provided for extensive design redundancy, conducted parallel development of alternative technologies, tested critical hardware beyond qualification levels to the point of failure, and performed rigorous root cause analysis of failures. The Grumman retirees also recommended active management of design margins, providing the lunar lander with generous instrumentation and telemetry capabilities, and furnishing a strong Lander advocate during CEV design.
Subject: Engineering Design (Phase C/D).
Show full item record
| contributor author | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) | |
| date accessioned | 2017-09-04T17:02:02Z | |
| date available | 2017-09-04T17:02:02Z | |
| date copyright | 39378 | |
| date issued | 2007 | |
| identifier other | XSXCQCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf | |
| identifier uri | https://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/125498 | |
| description abstract | Abstract: A July 2007 workshop attended by the former Grumman Corporation's Apollo Lunar Module Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Team and Constellation Program personnel traced the success of the Apollo Lunar Module (LM) to reliability features that were locked into an early stage of LM design. The LM prime contractor (Grumman Corporation) and NASA shared responsibility for system reliability, provided for early Reliability Engineering involvement in evaluating design alternatives at the cross-Apollo system level, placed great emphasis on identification and elimination of critical single point failures, provided for extensive design redundancy, conducted parallel development of alternative technologies, tested critical hardware beyond qualification levels to the point of failure, and performed rigorous root cause analysis of failures. The Grumman retirees also recommended active management of design margins, providing the lunar lander with generous instrumentation and telemetry capabilities, and furnishing a strong Lander advocate during CEV design. | |
| language | English | |
| title | NASA-LLIS-1835 | num |
| title | Lessons Learned - Capture of Apollo Lunar Module Reliability Lessons Learned: Reliability Engineering | en |
| type | standard | |
| page | 7 | |
| status | Active | |
| tree | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;2007 | |
| contenttype | fulltext | |
| subject keywords | Engineering Design (Phase C/D). | |
| subject keywords | Engineering Design (Phase C/D).Crew Survival Systems | |
| subject keywords | Engineering Design (Phase C/D).Environmental Control and Life Support Systems | |
| subject keywords | Engineering Design (Phase C/D).Human Health/Flight Medicine | |
| subject keywords | Engineering Design (Phase C/D).Lander Systems | |
| subject keywords | Engineering Design (Phase C/D).Power | |
| subject keywords | Engineering Design (Phase C/D).Spacecraft and Spacecraft Instruments | |
| subject keywords | Mission Operations and Ground Support Systems. | |
| subject keywords | Mission Operations and Ground Support Systems.Ground support systems | |
| subject keywords | Mission Operations and Ground Support Systems.Lunar Operations | |
| subject keywords | Mission Operations and Ground Support Systems.Mission control Planning | |
| subject keywords | Missions and Systems Requirements Definition. | |
| subject keywords | Missions and Systems Requirements Definition.Level 0/1 Requirements | |
| subject keywords | Missions and Systems Requirements Definition.Mission concepts and life-cycle planning | |
| subject keywords | Missions and Systems Requirements Definition.Vehicle concepts | |
| subject keywords | Program Management. | |
| subject keywords | Program Management.Contractor relationships | |
| subject keywords | Program Management.Cross Agency coordination | |
| subject keywords | Safety and Mission Assurance. | |
| subject keywords | Safety and Mission Assurance.Early requirements and standards definition | |
| subject keywords | Safety and Mission Assurance.Reliability |

درباره ما