• 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • درباره ما
  • درخواست موردی
  • فهرست استانداردها
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • راهنما
  • Login
  • لیست خرید شما 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
View Item 
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • View Item
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • View Item
  • All Fields
  • Title(or Doc Num)
  • Organization
  • Year
  • Subject
Advanced Search
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Archive

NASA-LLIS-1571

Lessons Learned – Streamlining and Standardizing Project Planning Documents (prepared during formulation and into implementation phases)

Organization:
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Year: 2005

Abstract: Abstract:
Advanced Air Transportation Technologies (AATT) was a nine-year effort and experienced significant changes in documentation requirements from Headquarters and the lead center. This had an effect on the policies, procedures, formats, and content for project planning and formulation documents including the program, project and sub-project plans (or IBPDs), along with related other agreements and supportive plans (e.g. Program Commitment Agreements, Risk Management/ Mitigation Plans, Tech Transfer Plans, etc.). Examples include everything from title and formatting changes to basic content requirements including the program and project Work Breakdown Structure (WBS).
The WBS continues to be a key tool that is recognized as being one of the most important basic building blocks around which a program and project(s) should be developed. Its potential for being the central structure, providing the basis for successful financial and Earned Value management and control, along with project metrics, technical and performance tracking, and schedule development cannot be denied. AATT experienced confusing and sometimes unclear guidance regarding the best way to develop a WBS for projects focused on concept exploration and development and demonstration. Both NASA and the private sector training provide theory and emphasize the key role and importance of a good WBS, but do not provide hands-on real world applications and assistance in creating a WBS for these types of projects. The various types of WBS formats and approaches are offered (e.g., organizational versus product versus work, etc.), but clear guidance as to real world applications for the best approach and how to do it, within the constraints and limitations of the NASA financial management system and full cost accounting, is lacking.
URI: https://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/132152
Subject: Administration/Organization
Collections :
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • Download PDF : (15.34Kb)
  • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
  • Statistics

    NASA-LLIS-1571

Show full item record

contributor authorNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
date accessioned2017-09-04T17:08:42Z
date available2017-09-04T17:08:42Z
date copyright06/07/2005
date issued2005
identifier otherYKXCQCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf
identifier urihttps://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/132152
description abstractAbstract:
Advanced Air Transportation Technologies (AATT) was a nine-year effort and experienced significant changes in documentation requirements from Headquarters and the lead center. This had an effect on the policies, procedures, formats, and content for project planning and formulation documents including the program, project and sub-project plans (or IBPDs), along with related other agreements and supportive plans (e.g. Program Commitment Agreements, Risk Management/ Mitigation Plans, Tech Transfer Plans, etc.). Examples include everything from title and formatting changes to basic content requirements including the program and project Work Breakdown Structure (WBS).
The WBS continues to be a key tool that is recognized as being one of the most important basic building blocks around which a program and project(s) should be developed. Its potential for being the central structure, providing the basis for successful financial and Earned Value management and control, along with project metrics, technical and performance tracking, and schedule development cannot be denied. AATT experienced confusing and sometimes unclear guidance regarding the best way to develop a WBS for projects focused on concept exploration and development and demonstration. Both NASA and the private sector training provide theory and emphasize the key role and importance of a good WBS, but do not provide hands-on real world applications and assistance in creating a WBS for these types of projects. The various types of WBS formats and approaches are offered (e.g., organizational versus product versus work, etc.), but clear guidance as to real world applications for the best approach and how to do it, within the constraints and limitations of the NASA financial management system and full cost accounting, is lacking.
languageEnglish
titleNASA-LLIS-1571num
titleLessons Learned – Streamlining and Standardizing Project Planning Documents (prepared during formulation and into implementation phases)en
typestandard
page3
statusActive
treeNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;2005
contenttypefulltext
subject keywordsAdministration/Organization
subject keywordsAir-Traffic Management
subject keywordsFinancial Management
subject keywordsProgram & Project Management
subject keywordsResearch & Development
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian
 
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian