درباره ما
NASA-LLIS-3758
Lessons Learned - Concurrent Engineering
Year: 2011
Abstract: Description of Driving Event:
Ares I-X showed the importance of concurrent engineering for large multiple-center projects. The team responsible for generating the processing procedures and for supporting on-vehicle testing should have been working with the design team early in the requirement development process. Ares I-X started using concurrent engineering late in the project and would have benefited by implementing it at the start of the project.
Ares I-X showed the importance of concurrent engineering for large multiple-center projects. The team responsible for generating the processing procedures and for supporting on-vehicle testing should have been working with the design team early in the requirement development process. Ares I-X started using concurrent engineering late in the project and would have benefited by implementing it at the start of the project.
Subject: Contractor relationships
Show full item record
| contributor author | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) | |
| date accessioned | 2017-09-04T17:13:22Z | |
| date available | 2017-09-04T17:13:22Z | |
| date copyright | 05/27/2011 | |
| date issued | 2011 | |
| identifier other | YXXKMEAAAAAAAAAA.pdf | |
| identifier uri | https://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/136852 | |
| description abstract | Description of Driving Event: Ares I-X showed the importance of concurrent engineering for large multiple-center projects. The team responsible for generating the processing procedures and for supporting on-vehicle testing should have been working with the design team early in the requirement development process. Ares I-X started using concurrent engineering late in the project and would have benefited by implementing it at the start of the project. | |
| language | English | |
| title | NASA-LLIS-3758 | num |
| title | Lessons Learned - Concurrent Engineering | en |
| type | standard | |
| page | 2 | |
| status | Active | |
| tree | NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;2011 | |
| contenttype | fulltext | |
| subject keywords | Contractor relationships | |
| subject keywords | Ground processing and manifesting | |
| subject keywords | Launch support systems | |
| subject keywords | Launch Systems | |
| subject keywords | Level II/III requirements definition | |
| subject keywords | Logistics and maintenance | |
| subject keywords | Organizational Planning | |
| subject keywords | Program level review processes | |
| subject keywords | Program planning | |
| subject keywords | development | |
| subject keywords | and management | |
| subject keywords | Review boards | |
| subject keywords | Risk management | |
| subject keywords | Spacecraft and Spacecraft Instruments | |
| subject keywords | Vehicle concepts |