• 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • درباره ما
  • درخواست موردی
  • فهرست استانداردها
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • راهنما
  • Login
  • لیست خرید شما 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
View Item 
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • View Item
  •   YSE
  • Defence Standards
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • View Item
  • All Fields
  • Title(or Doc Num)
  • Organization
  • Year
  • Subject
Advanced Search
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Archive

NASA-LLIS-0528

Lessons Learned – Improperly Conceived Acceptance Tests and Original Specifications

Organization:
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Year: 1994

Abstract: Description of Driving Event:
In preparation for a test in the tow tank, Naval Underwater Systems Center personnel, who operate the facility under an MOU, sought the recommendations of IRD for the purchase of thirteen wet/wet pressure transducers with amplified outputs. The IRD recommended manufacturer was Druck and the appropriate specifications for transducers in their product line were provided to NUSC personnel. When the PR reached purchasing, the facility was informed that a GSA contract manufacturer would be the supplier. The GSA contract manufacturer was contacted by both NUSC and the instrument support section, IRD, since the needed items were not part of the GSA contract manufacturer's product line. The GSA contract manufacturer gave assurances that they could custom build the transducers to the required specifications. Twelve of the ordered thirteen transducers were delivered more than two months behind schedule and the thirteenth one-two weeks later. All the transducers passed acceptance tests and met or exceeded the original specifications. The first time the facility introduced a wet test medium (fresh water) into the transducers, the output of two transducers became very erratic and a third leaked water through welded seams in the transducer case. The two with erratic output were returned to the GSA contract manufacturer. The leaking transducer cannot be sent back without shutting down the in-progress test. Before the PR went out, ISS advised purchasing of the questionable quality of the GSA contract manufacturer's products, but according to purchasing, because of the GSA contract system, the GSA contract manufacturer had to be the supplier.
URI: https://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/79471
Subject: Hardware
Collections :
  • NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • Download PDF : (13.39Kb)
  • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
  • Statistics

    NASA-LLIS-0528

Show full item record

contributor authorNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
date accessioned2017-09-04T16:16:09Z
date available2017-09-04T16:16:09Z
date copyright34612
date issued1994
identifier otherSZBEQCAAAAAAAAAA.pdf
identifier urihttps://yse.yabesh.ir/std/handle/yse/79471
description abstractDescription of Driving Event:
In preparation for a test in the tow tank, Naval Underwater Systems Center personnel, who operate the facility under an MOU, sought the recommendations of IRD for the purchase of thirteen wet/wet pressure transducers with amplified outputs. The IRD recommended manufacturer was Druck and the appropriate specifications for transducers in their product line were provided to NUSC personnel. When the PR reached purchasing, the facility was informed that a GSA contract manufacturer would be the supplier. The GSA contract manufacturer was contacted by both NUSC and the instrument support section, IRD, since the needed items were not part of the GSA contract manufacturer's product line. The GSA contract manufacturer gave assurances that they could custom build the transducers to the required specifications. Twelve of the ordered thirteen transducers were delivered more than two months behind schedule and the thirteenth one-two weeks later. All the transducers passed acceptance tests and met or exceeded the original specifications. The first time the facility introduced a wet test medium (fresh water) into the transducers, the output of two transducers became very erratic and a third leaked water through welded seams in the transducer case. The two with erratic output were returned to the GSA contract manufacturer. The leaking transducer cannot be sent back without shutting down the in-progress test. Before the PR went out, ISS advised purchasing of the questionable quality of the GSA contract manufacturer's products, but according to purchasing, because of the GSA contract system, the GSA contract manufacturer had to be the supplier.
languageEnglish
titleNASA-LLIS-0528num
titleLessons Learned – Improperly Conceived Acceptance Tests and Original Specificationsen
typestandard
page2
statusActive
treeNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):;1994
contenttypefulltext
subject keywordsHardware
subject keywordsProcurement Small Business & Industrial Relations
subject keywordsTest & Verification
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian
 
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian